Results of the 2010 Readers' Poll

By Niall Harrison

Before we get down to business, a quick question: why run a readers' poll?

This isn't the first time we've run one, but it's the first one for a few years, so it's a question we've thought about. My answer is that it's just part of what I expect a magazine like Strange Horizons to do. When I was a teenager, the annual polls in Interzone and, later, Asimov's, were something I looked forward to—I didn't always vote, but I wanted to see what won. Partly I think it was about wanting some sort of benchmark for my developing taste; partly it was the sense it gave of a connection to a community of readers, out there somewhere in the world; and partly it was the way it helped to give the magazines I was reading an identity and a history. Today, I can look at the lists of winners in those polls and see stories I remember fondly, and winners that have entered my personal canon. And—of course—some stories I think are terrible, and remain astonished anyone could have liked.

So all of that feeds into why I wanted to reinstate the Strange Horizons poll. There are a couple of changes to the last time we did this, back in 2005. (Which, as it happens, was the year I joined the magazine; some of the winners, such as the symposium on speculative poetry, I remember being things that helped convince me Strange Horizons was something I wanted to be part of.) We didn't run a columns poll this year, because the department was under strength; but we're rectifying that with the addition of Vandana Singh to our roster last week, and Genevieve Valentine today, and with more to come, so that category should be back next year. And we polled for Best Reviewer, rather than Best Review, partly because 150 different reviews would have made for an unwieldy drop-down menu, but mostly because what's valuable about a reviews department—for me—is the continuity of voices, the personality and perspective that evolves from a body of work.

The poll was open from 13.00 GMT on 21st February 2011 until 23.59 GMT on 6th March 2011. Here's how we scored it. Each person could vote for up to five works or nominees, ranking them 1 (first place) to 5 (fifth place). Each first-place vote was worth five points, each second-place vote was worth four points, and so on. It was not compulsory to vote in every category, nor to use all five slots in a given category. Multiple votes on one ballot for the same item were discarded, and we required a unique email address for the ballot to be submitted. Those addresses were only used to verify the validity of ballots, and were only saved for the duration of the poll.

In total, over 500 votes were cast; most ballots in each category used four or five nomination slots. And so, without further ado . . .

The Results

Best Story

Best Poem

Best Article

Best Reviewer

  • First place: Abigail Nussbaum
  • Second place: Adam Roberts
  • Third place: Niall Harrison
  • Fourth place: Matthew Cheney
  • Fifth place: Farah Mendlesohn

Congratulations to all the winners, who will receive a framed certificate marking their victory. And thanks to everybody who voted. Same time next year?


Niall Harrison is editor-in-chief of Strange Horizons.